| Wilmer | I'll put him on <a href=" http://www.afterfivebydesign.com/?topamax-dosing-for-migraine-effets-secondaires.pdf#rind ">how can i get a prescription for topamax safely</a> I guess with a whole skeleton preserved intact it should be a snap, I guess fragmentary skeletons might not conclusively prove gender due to possible gaps, leading to “is this a wide set of hips with missing bone or a narrow set?” but I guess the tradition seems to be to “assume male until proven otherwise” but that’s just lazy. I mean, the field is a *science* – and that’s about things you can prove, no? So why just assume things or offer unproven hypotheses as proof? |
|