| George | A financial advisor <a href=" http://www.cellogel.com/inquiry.php?doubledowncasino-horoscope-slots#mission ">free gladiator slots online</a> It does occur to me, however, that under the same theory whereby it is suggested that House Republicans might get out of the way and let House Democrats (with a smattering of Republicans) enact comprehensive immigration reform, it's theoretically possible, for much of the same rationale of not wanting to get blamed for killing legislation important to minority voters, that House Republicans could "let" Democrats restore Sections 4 and 5. <a href=" http://www.intwinedbows.com/pharaoh-slots-android-cheats.pdf#flare ">play van helsing slot game free online</a> And that's just in the run-up to the 2016 presidential primaries. "Any Republican who runs for president will have to support [the party's opposition to gay marriage]," the National Organization for Marriage's Brian Brown told Politico. "He will lose in the primary if he does not. Period." Note the assumption that any Republican running for president will be a "he" … but that's another issue. |
|