| Eliseo | We've got a joint account <a href=" http://www.elsiemagazine.com/apcalis-daily.pdf#shy ">avis sur apcalis</a> "For there to be such a case or controversy, it is not enough that the party invoking the power of the court have a keen interest in the issue," he said. "That party must also have "standing," which requires, among other things, that it have suffered a concrete and particularized injury. Because we find that petitioners do not have standing, we have no authority to decide this case on the merits, and neither did the Ninth Circuit." |
|